CO-OP ADMISSIONS
NEEDS FLEXIBILITY
Bills have been introduced in the
New York State Legislature and the
City Council which, if passed, would
force dramatic changes in long-standing
admissions procedures in housing
cooperatives. Each claims fairness
and transparency. CNYC disagrees
and urges you to contact your representatives
and ask that they oppose
these bills:
- S.7523 Hannon/A.10084 Lavine
would impose a one-size-fits-all
time frame on the Admissions Process.
Given the immense diversity
of housing cooperatives and the
fact that board members are volunteers
with other demands on their
time, CNYC finds this impractical.
Rather than improving the admissions
process, this legislation will
deprive boards of flexibility and will
likely result in more rejections.
- S.4551 Sanders/A.10216 Hunter
requires boards to provide a written
statement of reasons to any
rejected candidate. Imposing this
mandate on boards will likely discourage
shareholders from serving
on their boards. Many resources
are already available to prospective
purchasers who believe that a board
discriminated due to their membership
in a protected category.
- In the City Council much harsher
Int. 0822 deals with time frames
and Int. 0761 is punitive in its requirements
regarding reasons for
rejections. Both were introduced
this year by Brad Lander and Jumaane
Williams.
These proposed laws will undermine
decades of viable practice in
housing cooperative where the Admissions
process seeks to ascertain
that prospective purchasers are not
only financially able to pay all carrying
charges, but that they understand that
they are becoming part of a community
where they will be expected to contribute
their time and talents to making
the cooperative a congenial, thriving,
safe community.
COMMERCIAL RENT CONTROL:
COSTLY CONSEQUENCES
The City Council may soon consider
proposed Int.0737-A, which would institute
commercial rent control by requiring
property owners to offer ten-year renewal
leases to their commercial tenants, and to
resolve differences via arbitration. This
legislation could permanently saddle a
building with a difficult tenant; and when
an owner opts not to offer a renewal lease,
this legislation would require that the tenant
be given a reason for this decision.
When the tenant demands the issue be arbitrated,
the building could lose months or
more of rental income while the matter is
decided – with shareholders and unit owners
having to make up budget shortfalls.
Cooperatives and condominiums that
own and control commercial space should
continue to have the right to determine
what entity will occupy that space, and to
negotiate lease terms with them.
Please contact your lawmakers. Ask
that they oppose commercial rent control.
JUNE HEARINGS ON
LEAD PAINT BILLS
Legislation passed in 2004 required annual
lead paint inspections---and remediation
where necessary--in all NYC multiple
dwellings build prior to 1960 and established
procedures for removing or encapsulating
lead based paint. This June, the
City Council will hold a hearing on 23 bills
focus on many aspects of further controlling
lead paint. Among these is Int.873,
which would require of that in any multiple
dwelling built before January 1, 1960 that
has not previously been certified lead free,
as units become vacant all lead paint must
be removed or encapsulated. Other bills
that could impact cooperatives and condominiums
relate to testing water and soil
for lead content. CNYC is monitoring the
progress of these bills and will alert members
to any that are passed.
CONGRESS CONSIDERS
FEMA RECOVERY GRANTS
FOR COOPS/CONDOS/HOAS
In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy
we learned that FEMA could not provide
recovery grants for building systems destroyed
by disasters, because cooperatives,
condominiums and homeowner associations
are categorized not as homes,
but as small businesses. The National Association
of Housing has been working to
change this policy. Progress is very slow,
but Congressman Jerrold Nadler has
passed the Disaster Assistance Support
for Communities and Homeowners Act of
2017, requiring FEMA to report on how to
change this policy. This year, Mr. Nadler's
legislation has been included in H.R. 4, a
Federal Aviation Administration Reauthorization
measure that passed the House
of Representatives on April 27th. Senate
passage is expected.
REVERSE MORTGAGES
FOR SENIORS IN COOPS
In April, on behalf of the National Association
of Housing Cooperatives, CNYC
participated in a delegation that met
with experts at HUD to request that this
HUD administration reconsider a 2016
statement that HUD would not be making
reverse mortgage loans to seniors in
housing cooperatives, nor would it provide
guidelines for such loans. While this
meeting was cordial, HUD did not give any
indication that its policies would change.
In the absence of HUD support, NAHC
has turned to the providers of proprietary
reverse mortgage loans to encourage
them to make loans to seniors in housing
cooperatives. In New York State, a 1994
regulation currently presents an obstacle
to such loans. In 2016 and 2017, the
State Senate passed legislation removing
this obstacle, but the Assembly was
unwilling to consider companion legislation
at the time, expressing concern
about the need for consumer protections.
On May 16, 2018, Assembly member
Jeff Dinowitz introduced A.10755, a new
bill to allow reverse mortgages for seniors
aged 70 or older in New York housing cooperatives.
Senator Jeff Klein introduced
companion bill S.8888 on June 1st.
These bills contain extensive consumer
protections. They have been referred to
the banking committees in their houses.
CNYC will continue to monitor the progress
of this legislation and to encourage
lenders to consider providing reverse
mortgage loans to seniors in housing
cooperatives. Please ask your Albany
representatives to support this important
legislation.